Sam Houston St.
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,339  Karl Schreiber JR 34:18
1,443  Ryan Saam JR 34:27
1,554  Palo Ponce SR 34:37
1,949  Logan Terry JR 35:13
2,289  Lucio Rosas JR 35:54
2,520  Evan Arambula FR 36:27
2,862  John Bounds FR 37:48
3,050  Miguel Varnado FR 39:14
National Rank #210 of 311
South Central Region Rank #19 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 80.4%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Karl Schreiber Ryan Saam Palo Ponce Logan Terry Lucio Rosas Evan Arambula John Bounds Miguel Varnado
Islander Splash 09/27 1319 34:00 34:25 36:38 35:32 36:20 36:58 39:14
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/18 1312 35:27 34:50 34:56 35:07 37:15 36:27 37:56
Southland Conference Championships 11/01 1252 34:06 34:32 34:23 35:04 35:32 36:17 37:41
South Central Region Championships 11/15 1257 34:14 33:59 34:36 34:53 36:01 36:56 38:49





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.4 546 0.1 9.3 13.3 14.0 15.8 15.1 12.9 10.2 6.0 2.4 0.8 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Karl Schreiber 82.3
Ryan Saam 89.7
Palo Ponce 97.4
Logan Terry 121.4
Lucio Rosas 146.8
Evan Arambula 163.8
John Bounds 190.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 9.3% 9.3 15
16 13.3% 13.3 16
17 14.0% 14.0 17
18 15.8% 15.8 18
19 15.1% 15.1 19
20 12.9% 12.9 20
21 10.2% 10.2 21
22 6.0% 6.0 22
23 2.4% 2.4 23
24 0.8% 0.8 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0